+143.0%
AXON vs HTZ
-86.4%
+229.4%
-60.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.2% | +1.3% | -5.5% | -4.2% |
| 7D | -14.2% | +7.5% | -21.6% | -14.2% |
| 30D | -15.4% | +47.4% | -62.8% | -15.4% |
| 3M | +0.5% | -54.9% | +55.4% | +2.2% |
| 6M | -9.5% | -47.0% | +37.5% | -9.0% |
| YTD | -9.2% | -55.3% | +46.1% | -8.1% |
| 1Y | -29.4% | -57.6% | +28.3% | -28.5% |
| All | +143.0% | -86.4% | +229.4% | +169.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling