+297.5%
AVGO vs ZM
+57.7%
+239.8%
-41.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | -0.4% | +5.9% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +25.0% | +10.0% | +15.0% | +22.2% |
| 30D | +2.0% | -0.5% | +2.4% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -12.3% | -7.1% | -5.2% | -11.1% |
| 6M | -12.8% | -5.1% | -7.7% | -12.2% |
| YTD | +5.9% | +13.2% | -7.4% | +1.3% |
| 1Y | +3.3% | +15.3% | -12.0% | -1.7% |
| All | +297.5% | +57.7% | +239.8% | +270.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling