+335.4%
AVGO vs ZBRA
+33.4%
+302.0%
-41.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZBRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.2% | -0.7% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -3.8% | +4.8% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -10.2% | -3.1% | -9.4% |
| 3M | -2.9% | +58.7% | -61.6% | -22.3% |
| 6M | +5.7% | +61.9% | -56.2% | -16.8% |
| YTD | +4.6% | +41.7% | -37.0% | -13.7% |
| 1Y | -1.6% | +12.4% | -14.0% | -9.5% |
| All | +335.4% | +33.4% | +302.0% | +279.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZBRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZBRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZBRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZBRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling