+336.8%
AVGO vs XLV
+31.7%
+305.1%
-41.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.2% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -3.6% | +4.7% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -13.0% | -1.8% | -11.2% | -12.9% |
| 3M | -6.0% | +7.8% | -13.8% | -8.2% |
| 6M | +6.4% | +9.1% | -2.7% | +3.4% |
| YTD | +5.0% | +7.7% | -2.8% | +2.4% |
| 1Y | +1.4% | +20.4% | -19.0% | -6.7% |
| 3Y | +336.8% | +30.8% | +306.0% | +281.4% |
| All | +336.8% | +31.7% | +305.1% | +281.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling