+40.9%
ATGL vs VOO
+91.9%
-50.9%
-95.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | -0.4% | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| 7D | -16.2% | +0.1% | -16.3% | -16.4% |
| 30D | -16.2% | +0.1% | -16.3% | -16.2% |
| 3M | -57.2% | +2.0% | -59.3% | -58.0% |
| 6M | -62.9% | +13.0% | -75.9% | -67.0% |
| YTD | -70.4% | +13.6% | -84.0% | -73.7% |
| 1Y | -81.2% | +20.1% | -101.3% | -84.4% |
| All | +40.9% | +91.9% | -50.9% | -62.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling