+873.8%
ASTS vs UMAC
+197.5%
+676.3%
-77.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.1% | +10.8% | -3.7% | +5.0% |
| 7D | -21.1% | -23.4% | +2.3% | -16.8% |
| 30D | -46.7% | -45.6% | -1.1% | -40.1% |
| 3M | -52.0% | -50.9% | -1.1% | -45.5% |
| 6M | -54.3% | -16.5% | -37.7% | -53.1% |
| YTD | -55.5% | -6.6% | -48.9% | -55.1% |
| 1Y | -50.5% | +10.7% | -61.2% | -51.0% |
| All | +873.8% | +197.5% | +676.3% | +806.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling