+1,505.9%
ASTS vs NIO
-64.6%
+1,570.5%
-68.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -1.6% | +1.8% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +7.3% | -13.0% | +20.4% | +12.6% |
| 30D | -8.9% | -18.3% | +9.4% | -2.2% |
| 3M | -41.9% | -33.2% | -8.7% | -32.8% |
| 6M | -40.6% | -21.5% | -19.1% | -35.9% |
| YTD | -14.2% | -25.5% | +11.3% | -6.0% |
| 1Y | +48.9% | -38.0% | +86.9% | +71.1% |
| All | +1,505.9% | -64.6% | +1,570.5% | +1,745.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling