+706.2%
ASTS vs NIO
-59.9%
+766.1%
-77.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.1% | +5.9% | +1.1% | +4.9% |
| 7D | -21.1% | +5.6% | -26.7% | -22.5% |
| 30D | -46.7% | -4.2% | -42.5% | -45.8% |
| 3M | -52.0% | -26.3% | -25.7% | -46.5% |
| 6M | -54.3% | -42.5% | -11.7% | -44.7% |
| YTD | -55.5% | -33.5% | -22.0% | -49.1% |
| 1Y | -50.5% | -52.7% | +2.2% | -36.7% |
| 3Y | +706.2% | -57.5% | +763.7% | +969.9% |
| All | +706.2% | -59.9% | +766.1% | +969.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling