+107.4%
ASTS vs KRMN
+33.3%
+74.1%
-60.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -1.3% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +7.3% | -12.3% | +19.6% | +15.4% |
| 30D | -8.9% | -27.5% | +18.6% | +9.4% |
| 3M | -41.9% | -26.5% | -15.4% | -30.9% |
| 6M | -40.6% | -59.6% | +19.0% | -1.9% |
| YTD | -14.2% | -45.4% | +31.2% | +23.2% |
| 1Y | +48.9% | -25.1% | +74.0% | +89.6% |
| All | +107.4% | +33.3% | +74.1% | +107.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling