+164.9%
ASML vs XLF
+75.8%
+89.1%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -0.8% | +5.0% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +1.1% | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +2.2% | +0.2% | +2.0% | +1.9% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +11.7% | -14.0% | -10.7% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +13.8% | +9.2% | +10.7% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +7.0% | +54.1% | +52.0% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +9.1% | +120.0% | +112.4% |
| All | +164.9% | +75.8% | +89.1% | +48.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling