+47.5%
ASML vs TRGP
+76.5%
-29.0%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +0.3% | -0.5% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +12.4% | -7.4% | +5.0% |
| 30D | -9.3% | +2.6% | -11.9% | -9.1% |
| 3M | -19.0% | +11.9% | -30.8% | -17.6% |
| 6M | -5.2% | +13.9% | -19.1% | -2.8% |
| YTD | +40.6% | +64.2% | -23.6% | +55.4% |
| 1Y | +47.5% | +78.5% | -31.0% | +66.3% |
| All | +47.5% | +76.5% | -29.0% | +66.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling