+129.1%
ASML vs TRGP
+80.7%
+48.4%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -1.2% | +5.4% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +0.8% | +0.3% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +2.2% | +11.5% | -9.3% | +3.8% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +9.0% | -11.3% | -0.7% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +20.5% | +2.5% | +27.2% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +59.5% | +1.5% | +72.4% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +77.9% | +51.2% | +148.2% |
| All | +129.1% | +80.7% | +48.4% | +148.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling