+76.7%
ASML vs RDDT
+228.6%
-152.0%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RDDT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -1.0% | +5.2% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +1.0% | +0.1% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -0.5% | +2.7% | +1.9% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -16.0% | +13.7% | -1.3% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +4.9% | +18.1% | +19.7% |
| YTD | +61.1% | -32.8% | +93.9% | +65.2% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | -33.5% | +162.6% | +133.1% |
| All | +76.7% | +228.6% | -152.0% | +37.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RDDT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RDDT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RDDT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RDDT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling