+164.9%
ASML vs PLD
+21.6%
+143.3%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -0.7% | +4.9% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -2.4% | +3.5% | +2.0% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -2.4% | +4.6% | +3.1% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -3.8% | +1.5% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +23.0% | 0.0% | +23.0% | +22.0% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +9.2% | +51.8% | +53.7% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +25.9% | +103.2% | +105.6% |
| All | +164.9% | +21.6% | +143.3% | +116.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling