+46.0%
ASML vs NTAP
+56.4%
-10.3%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | 0.0% | -0.3% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -7.8% | +4.9% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -15.2% | -25.8% | +10.6% | -8.6% |
| 3M | -12.9% | -11.2% | -1.7% | -9.6% |
| 6M | -5.0% | +49.9% | -55.0% | -12.6% |
| YTD | +41.8% | +66.9% | -25.1% | +26.7% |
| 1Y | +46.0% | +58.8% | -12.8% | +34.6% |
| All | +46.0% | +56.4% | -10.3% | +34.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling