+117.9%
ASML vs NDAQ
+122.0%
-4.1%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NDAQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.3% | -2.6% | -6.7% | -8.9% |
| 7D | -19.0% | +1.2% | -20.2% | -19.2% |
| 30D | -25.9% | +15.8% | -41.7% | -27.8% |
| 3M | -19.1% | +13.4% | -32.4% | -20.9% |
| 6M | -5.7% | +20.9% | -26.6% | -9.5% |
| YTD | +27.6% | +11.1% | +16.5% | +26.4% |
| 1Y | +30.8% | +26.5% | +4.3% | +21.9% |
| All | +117.9% | +122.0% | -4.1% | +45.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NDAQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NDAQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NDAQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NDAQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling