+182.5%
ASML vs MOH
-39.4%
+221.9%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MOH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -1.1% | -0.9% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -4.2% | +7.0% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -2.4% | +2.1% | -0.3% |
| 3M | -2.6% | -4.4% | +1.8% | -2.7% |
| 6M | +27.9% | +32.9% | -5.1% | +28.0% |
| YTD | +62.4% | +11.9% | +50.6% | +62.2% |
| 1Y | +116.2% | +6.9% | +109.3% | +116.0% |
| All | +182.5% | -39.4% | +221.9% | +173.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MOH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MOH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MOH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MOH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling