+108.6%
ASML vs LUNR
+53.5%
+55.1%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LUNR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +0.7% | +3.4% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -3.6% | +4.7% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +2.2% | +5.9% | -3.7% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -56.0% | +53.7% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +23.0% | -20.5% | +43.4% | +23.3% |
| YTD | +61.1% | -8.7% | +69.8% | +61.2% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +75.9% | +53.2% | +128.7% |
| 3Y | +165.4% | +202.9% | -37.5% | +168.7% |
| All | +108.6% | +53.5% | +55.1% | +110.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LUNR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LUNR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LUNR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LUNR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling