+164.9%
ASML vs INSM
+425.1%
-260.2%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | INSM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -0.3% | +4.5% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +6.5% | -5.4% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +2.2% | +27.5% | -25.4% | +0.3% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +20.4% | -22.7% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +23.0% | -15.7% | +38.7% | +23.3% |
| YTD | +61.1% | -27.4% | +88.5% | +62.7% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | -11.4% | +140.5% | +128.4% |
| All | +164.9% | +425.1% | -260.2% | +143.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INSM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INSM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INSM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INSM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling