+164.9%
ASML vs GLW
+400.9%
-236.0%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLW | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +5.7% | -1.5% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +3.8% | -2.7% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -1.3% | +3.5% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -21.8% | +19.5% | +5.7% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +6.9% | +16.1% | +11.9% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +77.2% | -16.1% | +11.6% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +123.2% | +5.9% | +39.2% |
| All | +164.9% | +400.9% | -236.0% | +3.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLW.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLW return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLW return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLW wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling