+30.8%
ASML vs GLDM
+2.8%
+28.0%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.3% | +0.8% | -10.2% | -9.7% |
| 7D | -19.0% | +1.9% | -20.9% | -19.7% |
| 30D | -25.9% | -1.7% | -24.2% | -25.3% |
| 3M | -19.1% | -3.5% | -15.5% | -18.0% |
| 6M | -5.7% | -10.1% | +4.3% | -1.7% |
| YTD | +27.6% | -5.0% | +32.6% | +30.1% |
| 1Y | +30.8% | +2.8% | +28.0% | +24.9% |
| All | +30.8% | +2.8% | +28.0% | +24.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling