+123.1%
ASML vs FLNC
+45.6%
+77.5%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | +6.7% | -3.8% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +6.0% | +6.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +1.4% | -16.3% | +17.7% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -54.1% | +55.2% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +37.0% | -25.3% | +62.3% | +40.4% |
| YTD | +65.8% | -44.2% | +109.9% | +72.2% |
| 1Y | +123.1% | +53.1% | +70.0% | +108.1% |
| All | +123.1% | +45.6% | +77.5% | +108.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling