+144.0%
ASML vs FBTC
+65.3%
+78.7%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FBTC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -2.5% | +6.7% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +2.9% | -1.8% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +2.2% | +23.0% | -20.8% | -2.6% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +25.6% | -27.9% | -7.3% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +9.0% | +14.0% | +20.0% |
| YTD | +61.1% | -8.9% | +70.0% | +61.9% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | -27.5% | +156.6% | +140.3% |
| All | +144.0% | +65.3% | +78.7% | +128.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FBTC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FBTC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FBTC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FBTC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling