+164.9%
ASML vs EXPD
+68.7%
+96.2%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EXPD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +0.9% | +3.3% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -1.1% | +2.2% | +1.5% |
| 30D | +2.2% | +4.1% | -1.9% | +0.6% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +17.9% | -20.2% | -8.4% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +29.2% | -6.3% | +10.8% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +27.4% | +33.7% | +44.3% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +56.8% | +72.3% | +84.0% |
| All | +164.9% | +68.7% | +96.2% | +94.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EXPD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EXPD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EXPD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EXPD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling