+39.3%
ASML vs EOSE
-89.0%
+128.3%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.0% | -7.4% | +12.5% | +6.2% |
| 7D | -9.0% | -7.9% | -1.1% | -8.0% |
| 30D | -21.0% | -43.9% | +22.9% | -14.0% |
| 3M | -16.3% | -55.8% | +39.5% | -6.0% |
| 6M | -7.5% | -73.4% | +65.9% | +10.5% |
| YTD | +34.0% | -84.8% | +118.8% | +64.9% |
| 1Y | +39.3% | -88.6% | +127.9% | +73.4% |
| All | +39.3% | -89.0% | +128.3% | +73.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling