+164.9%
ASML vs ENTG
+37.4%
+127.6%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +6.2% | -2.0% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +2.8% | -1.7% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -4.7% | +6.9% | +4.0% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -0.7% | -1.6% | -5.1% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +7.7% | +15.3% | +13.2% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +65.1% | -4.0% | +16.7% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +74.8% | +54.3% | +57.3% |
| All | +164.9% | +37.4% | +127.6% | +118.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling