+128.9%
ASML vs ENTG
+39.6%
+89.3%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.0% | +2.6% | +2.4% | +3.6% |
| 7D | -9.0% | -17.1% | +8.1% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -21.0% | -23.0% | +2.0% | -9.8% |
| 3M | -16.3% | -10.2% | -6.1% | -12.8% |
| 6M | -7.5% | -17.8% | +10.2% | -1.7% |
| YTD | +34.0% | +52.4% | -18.4% | +0.3% |
| 1Y | +39.3% | +49.8% | -10.5% | +4.6% |
| 3Y | +128.9% | +42.1% | +86.7% | +82.1% |
| All | +128.9% | +39.6% | +89.3% | +82.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling