+164.9%
ASML vs ENB
+67.6%
+97.4%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -0.9% | +5.0% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -0.2% | +1.3% | +1.1% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -2.2% | +4.4% | +2.4% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -10.5% | +8.2% | -1.0% |
| 6M | +23.0% | -5.1% | +28.0% | +23.5% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +9.0% | +52.1% | +58.0% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +8.2% | +120.9% | +124.9% |
| All | +164.9% | +67.6% | +97.4% | +135.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling