+164.9%
ASML vs EBAY
+142.2%
+22.8%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EBAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -2.3% | +6.5% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -2.1% | +3.2% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -6.7% | +8.9% | +3.0% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -5.0% | +2.7% | -2.0% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +14.6% | +8.3% | +19.4% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +19.8% | +41.2% | +55.4% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +12.6% | +116.5% | +121.8% |
| All | +164.9% | +142.2% | +22.8% | +105.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EBAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EBAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EBAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EBAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling