+164.9%
ASML vs DLR
+56.7%
+108.3%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DLR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +0.3% | +3.9% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +1.6% | -0.5% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -3.4% | +5.5% | +3.9% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +0.5% | -2.8% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +4.6% | +18.4% | +19.0% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +23.4% | +37.6% | +42.0% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +19.0% | +110.1% | +105.0% |
| All | +164.9% | +56.7% | +108.3% | +94.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DLR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DLR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DLR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DLR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling