+117.9%
ASML vs CMS
+38.3%
+79.6%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.3% | -0.4% | -8.9% | -9.5% |
| 7D | -19.0% | +1.7% | -20.7% | -18.4% |
| 30D | -25.9% | +8.6% | -34.6% | -23.0% |
| 3M | -19.1% | -0.5% | -18.6% | -19.0% |
| 6M | -5.7% | -4.2% | -1.6% | -6.8% |
| YTD | +27.6% | +3.4% | +24.1% | +30.5% |
| 1Y | +30.8% | +0.4% | +30.3% | +32.3% |
| All | +117.9% | +38.3% | +79.6% | +142.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling