+164.9%
ASML vs CLS
+1,229.1%
-1,064.2%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +0.8% | +3.4% | +3.9% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +4.6% | -3.5% | -0.7% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -13.9% | +16.1% | +6.1% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -26.6% | +24.3% | +6.0% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +15.4% | +7.6% | +12.9% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +5.7% | +55.4% | +49.9% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +41.1% | +88.0% | +87.2% |
| All | +164.9% | +1,229.1% | -1,064.2% | -23.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling