+164.9%
ASML vs CG
+58.1%
+106.8%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -1.6% | +5.8% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -4.3% | +5.4% | +3.0% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -5.1% | +7.3% | +4.2% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +8.7% | -11.0% | -6.5% |
| 6M | +23.0% | -9.2% | +32.2% | +27.2% |
| YTD | +61.1% | -18.9% | +79.9% | +73.8% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | -25.6% | +154.7% | +155.8% |
| All | +164.9% | +58.1% | +106.8% | +95.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling