+117.9%
ASML vs ALHC
+25.6%
+92.3%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.3% | -7.1% | -2.2% | -9.1% |
| 7D | -19.0% | -6.2% | -12.8% | -18.9% |
| 30D | -25.9% | -9.7% | -16.3% | -25.8% |
| 3M | -19.1% | -44.7% | +25.7% | -18.0% |
| 6M | -5.7% | -58.7% | +53.0% | -4.0% |
| YTD | +27.6% | -61.7% | +89.3% | +30.0% |
| 1Y | +30.8% | -55.7% | +86.5% | +33.0% |
| All | +117.9% | +25.6% | +92.3% | +105.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling