+142.8%
ASML vs ADVB
-88.3%
+231.2%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ADVB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -0.7% | +4.9% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -3.8% | +4.9% | +1.1% |
| 30D | +2.2% | +17.6% | -15.4% | +1.9% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +119.1% | -121.4% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +103.4% | -80.4% | +20.1% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +59.8% | +1.2% | +58.6% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | +8.5% | +120.6% | +127.1% |
| All | +142.8% | -88.3% | +231.2% | +184.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ADVB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ADVB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ADVB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ADVB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling