+98.9%
AS vs UMAC
+494.0%
-395.1%
-40.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.6% | -3.1% | +6.6% | +3.7% |
| 7D | -4.9% | -0.9% | -4.0% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -19.6% | -7.7% | -11.9% | -19.5% |
| 3M | -14.4% | -26.4% | +12.1% | -13.9% |
| 6M | -20.1% | +61.9% | -82.0% | -24.0% |
| YTD | -20.9% | +86.5% | -107.4% | -25.8% |
| 1Y | -21.9% | +156.3% | -178.2% | -28.6% |
| All | +98.9% | +494.0% | -395.1% | +57.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling