+120.4%
AS vs LDOS
+23.5%
+96.9%
-40.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.6% | +0.5% | +3.1% | +3.5% |
| 7D | -4.9% | -5.4% | +0.5% | -4.1% |
| 30D | -19.6% | +4.9% | -24.5% | -20.1% |
| 3M | -14.4% | +7.2% | -21.6% | -15.6% |
| 6M | -20.1% | -24.2% | +4.1% | -17.3% |
| YTD | -20.9% | -25.8% | +4.9% | -18.1% |
| 1Y | -21.9% | -24.7% | +2.9% | -19.3% |
| All | +120.4% | +23.5% | +96.9% | +161.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling