+124.3%
ARMK vs TPG
+78.9%
+45.4%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -4.0% | +3.8% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -0.9% | -11.8% | +10.9% | +1.8% |
| 30D | -5.9% | -6.3% | +0.3% | -4.9% |
| 3M | +6.7% | +13.6% | -6.9% | +3.1% |
| 6M | +42.5% | +13.8% | +28.7% | +37.0% |
| YTD | +55.1% | -23.7% | +78.9% | +64.3% |
| 1Y | +50.3% | -18.2% | +68.5% | +55.7% |
| All | +124.3% | +78.9% | +45.4% | +93.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling