+98.1%
ARMK vs EPAM
-77.4%
+175.5%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.5% | -3.9% | +8.3% | +5.0% |
| 7D | -2.6% | +13.4% | -16.0% | -4.7% |
| 30D | -5.2% | +47.1% | -52.3% | -10.8% |
| 3M | -6.5% | +71.2% | -77.7% | -14.2% |
| 6M | +15.3% | +48.9% | -33.7% | +7.1% |
| YTD | +43.6% | -22.2% | +65.8% | +46.9% |
| 1Y | +42.1% | -5.2% | +47.2% | +40.6% |
| 3Y | +94.0% | -34.9% | +129.0% | +97.9% |
| All | +98.1% | -77.4% | +175.5% | +120.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling