+296.4%
ARM vs NIO
-62.6%
+359.0%
-54.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -1.6% | +5.5% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +5.5% | -13.0% | +18.5% | +8.8% |
| 30D | -8.2% | -18.3% | +10.1% | -4.1% |
| 3M | -35.9% | -33.2% | -2.7% | -29.8% |
| 6M | +103.1% | -21.5% | +124.6% | +111.3% |
| YTD | +130.6% | -25.5% | +156.1% | +142.4% |
| 1Y | +86.1% | -38.0% | +124.1% | +102.7% |
| All | +296.4% | -62.6% | +359.0% | +360.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling