+101.6%
ARKK vs GLDM
+248.1%
-146.6%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.9% | -0.2% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -0.5% | +2.5% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +13.2% | +4.4% | +8.8% | +11.7% |
| 3M | +7.7% | -1.1% | +8.7% | +8.1% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -13.7% | +28.7% | +19.9% |
| YTD | +12.1% | +2.8% | +9.3% | +11.3% |
| 1Y | +14.9% | +24.8% | -9.9% | +8.5% |
| 3Y | +99.3% | +127.8% | -28.5% | +53.9% |
| 5Y | -29.9% | +141.1% | -171.1% | -48.0% |
| All | +101.6% | +248.1% | -146.6% | +54.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling