+109.7%
ARKF vs VOO
+75.9%
+33.8%
-38.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.6% | -0.5% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -6.1% | -2.0% | -4.1% | -2.6% |
| 30D | +3.5% | -1.7% | +5.2% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +18.4% | +4.7% | +13.7% | +9.2% |
| 6M | +8.7% | +12.6% | -3.9% | -11.6% |
| YTD | -6.1% | +11.8% | -17.8% | -22.3% |
| 1Y | -16.9% | +17.5% | -34.5% | -36.6% |
| All | +109.7% | +75.9% | +33.8% | -23.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling