+6.1%
ARES vs UMAC
+508.0%
-501.9%
-50.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | -6.4% | +3.3% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -2.7% | +3.3% | -5.9% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -2.4% | -10.4% | +8.0% | -2.3% |
| 3M | +3.9% | +1.8% | +2.2% | +3.2% |
| 6M | +26.4% | +40.7% | -14.4% | +22.9% |
| YTD | -14.9% | +90.9% | -105.8% | -18.4% |
| 1Y | -20.4% | +151.8% | -172.2% | -24.6% |
| All | +6.1% | +508.0% | -501.9% | -0.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling