+48.4%
ARES vs LDOS
+39.7%
+8.7%
-50.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +0.5% | -1.5% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -5.4% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +0.3% | +4.9% | -4.6% | -1.4% |
| 3M | +8.5% | +7.2% | +1.3% | +5.5% |
| 6M | +23.5% | -24.2% | +47.7% | +32.8% |
| YTD | -11.2% | -25.8% | +14.6% | -4.4% |
| 1Y | -19.3% | -24.7% | +5.4% | -13.5% |
| All | +48.4% | +39.7% | +8.7% | +46.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling