-24.3%
ARES vs GTLB
-1.8%
-22.5%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | +2.1% | -4.9% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -4.1% | -3.6% | -7.0% |
| 30D | -8.7% | +12.3% | -21.0% | -11.1% |
| 3M | +2.8% | +65.9% | -63.1% | -7.4% |
| 6M | +23.1% | +104.0% | -80.9% | +3.7% |
| YTD | -17.3% | +26.0% | -43.3% | -24.3% |
| 1Y | -24.3% | -3.5% | -20.8% | -25.1% |
| All | -24.3% | -1.8% | -22.5% | -25.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling