+39.3%
ARES vs BIIB
-19.0%
+58.2%
-50.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | -0.8% | -2.2% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -5.4% | +2.7% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -2.4% | +1.7% | -4.1% | -2.6% |
| 3M | +3.9% | +5.8% | -1.9% | +2.7% |
| 6M | +26.4% | +11.9% | +14.4% | +23.2% |
| YTD | -14.9% | +19.7% | -34.6% | -18.2% |
| 1Y | -20.4% | +46.7% | -67.2% | -26.4% |
| All | +39.3% | -19.0% | +58.2% | +39.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling