-42.3%
APTV vs UMAC
+488.3%
-530.5%
-49.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | -3.2% | +5.9% | +2.7% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -4.0% | +2.2% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -7.9% | -9.4% | +1.5% | -7.8% |
| 3M | -29.9% | +3.0% | -32.9% | -30.4% |
| 6M | -36.6% | +27.2% | -63.8% | -37.9% |
| YTD | -40.0% | +84.7% | -124.6% | -41.8% |
| 1Y | -44.0% | +136.5% | -180.5% | -46.3% |
| All | -42.3% | +488.3% | -530.5% | -46.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling