-54.2%
APTV vs TNA
+99.7%
-153.9%
-56.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | -3.0% | +5.7% | +3.6% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -7.6% | +5.8% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -7.9% | -13.6% | +5.7% | -3.5% |
| 3M | -29.9% | +2.8% | -32.8% | -31.1% |
| 6M | -36.6% | +34.5% | -71.1% | -43.6% |
| YTD | -40.0% | +41.0% | -81.0% | -47.8% |
| 1Y | -44.0% | +52.0% | -96.0% | -53.1% |
| All | -54.2% | +99.7% | -153.9% | -66.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling