-47.8%
APTV vs ONTO
+60.0%
-107.8%
-56.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ONTO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +8.9% | -9.3% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -8.9% | +16.4% | -25.3% | -11.5% |
| 30D | -9.5% | -21.4% | +11.9% | -6.5% |
| 3M | -20.6% | -32.7% | +12.2% | -16.2% |
| 6M | -28.9% | -25.2% | -3.7% | -27.9% |
| YTD | -48.2% | +36.2% | -84.4% | -54.1% |
| 1Y | -51.7% | +61.2% | -112.9% | -58.8% |
| All | -47.8% | +60.0% | -107.8% | -60.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONTO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONTO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONTO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONTO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling