-52.2%
APTV vs NIO
-55.0%
+2.8%
-56.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -4.9% | +4.8% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -14.5% | +12.7% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -11.6% | -15.0% | +3.4% | -9.6% |
| 3M | -21.2% | -35.6% | +14.4% | -16.5% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -55.7% | +27.1% | -21.5% |
| YTD | -49.1% | -43.1% | -5.9% | -45.6% |
| 1Y | -52.2% | -53.5% | +1.3% | -46.1% |
| All | -52.2% | -55.0% | +2.8% | -46.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling