-47.8%
APTV vs HTZ
-80.7%
+33.0%
-56.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +9.3% | -9.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -8.9% | -27.4% | +18.5% | -5.9% |
| 30D | -9.5% | -11.4% | +1.8% | -8.7% |
| 3M | -20.6% | -33.1% | +12.5% | -18.0% |
| 6M | -28.9% | -73.5% | +44.6% | -20.3% |
| YTD | -48.2% | -68.1% | +19.9% | -43.9% |
| 1Y | -51.7% | -74.3% | +22.6% | -46.4% |
| All | -47.8% | -80.7% | +33.0% | -40.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling