-53.5%
APTV vs EPAM
-54.6%
+1.1%
-56.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | -2.4% | +5.4% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +4.8% | +2.0% | +2.9% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +2.0% | +6.5% | -4.5% | +0.3% |
| 3M | -34.2% | +19.9% | -54.2% | -37.3% |
| 6M | -34.7% | -16.9% | -17.7% | -31.9% |
| YTD | -37.0% | -42.9% | +5.9% | -28.2% |
| 1Y | -40.4% | -30.4% | -10.0% | -36.3% |
| All | -53.5% | -54.6% | +1.1% | -43.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling